|
Ramp
Speed comparison test.
A lot has been made of the “latest thing” in cam design. The
“fast ramp” cams seem to be all the rage these days, especially in
Buicks. The theory goes like this:
“For
a real full weight street GS, why design a gentle-lobed cam that will rev to
6000+ RPM when your
engine makes peak horsepower below 5500 RPM? It makes a lot more senses to
design a cam with more aggressive lobes and a wider lobe separation, (less
overlap = better idle) that offers more “breathing area” under the valve
lift curve to produce peak horsepower at the RPM the engine will make it’s
most horsepower! … Who cares if the cam will run to 6000 RPM if the engine
makes its maximum horsepower no higher than 5500 RPM regardless
of cam!”
--Richard
Lasseter, Nov-Dec 2000 GSXTRA pg. 6
Wanting
to test this theory, and since one of TA’s new cam designs was very similar to
a popular “fast ramp” profile, a test was run, to compare the two. The TA
cam has a standard ramp hydraulic cam profile, and has considerably less lift.
Duration numbers are nearly identical, and the lobe center separation of the
cams is only 1 degree apart. Certainly, with a fast ramp profile, with more
lift, and 3 degrees more exhaust duration, the Straightline Performance cam
should out-power the TA Street Intimidator.
Engine componentsStock
intake Q-jet
carb Shorty headers
|
Send mail to (info-at-trishieldperf.com) with
questions or comments about this web site.
|